06-11-2007, 04:32 PM
Tony,
Thanks for the reply.
My vote is for it honouring the fixed ratio. I've just tried five other programs and all do this, so it is a sort of standard. It would also be good to have a drop down list of common ratios and to be able to add user definable ones as well.
In addition to this and the ability to straighten or tilt the image, can I suggest that the dimensions are also shown when cropping.
Just as a matter of interest I have tried PP on a 'finished' example of facial enhancement from a Photoshop tutorial. To be fair I zeroed the facial sculpting but still got a slightly better result and a lot quicker than with PS. I doubt they would want me to upload thier image here but if anyone wants to have a go themselves it can be found here
Thanks for the reply.
My vote is for it honouring the fixed ratio. I've just tried five other programs and all do this, so it is a sort of standard. It would also be good to have a drop down list of common ratios and to be able to add user definable ones as well.
In addition to this and the ability to straighten or tilt the image, can I suggest that the dimensions are also shown when cropping.
Just as a matter of interest I have tried PP on a 'finished' example of facial enhancement from a Photoshop tutorial. To be fair I zeroed the facial sculpting but still got a slightly better result and a lot quicker than with PS. I doubt they would want me to upload thier image here but if anyone wants to have a go themselves it can be found here
Regards, Fred
Progress has little to do with speed,
but much to do with direction
Progress has little to do with speed,
but much to do with direction