• ¡Welcome to the PortraitPro Forum!
  • Portrait Professional is now PortraitPro!
Hello There, Guest! Login Register


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ad image - a clean-up too far?
#8
I agree with this on on Miss Freckle.  I thought completely removing features like freckles would have everyone that knows them wondering, "What happened??!"  In fact, unless a subject requested removal, I'll bet many would not care for those results.

john hawk Wrote:As a user of PP for several years, I have found it very useful on occasions; however I have to take issue with the treatment applied to the face of the woman shown in the email sent as an ad for the new version, as it  shows a level of feature alteration I would never dream of using on one of my portraits.
Yes, I mean the complete removal of her freckles! This , I feel, completely alters her character and is in a wholy different league to the complaints of " plastic skin " if too many features are removed when processing with PP.
This comment is not meant to knock PP, and I would like to hear what other users think of this level of transformation when processing a portrait.
Thanks in advance for any contributions.
John.
[/color]
 
  


Messages In This Thread
Ad image - a clean-up too far? - john hawk - 08-24-2010, 10:42 PM
RE: Ad image - a clean-up too far? - MKvipBeauty - 09-13-2010, 02:56 PM
RE: Ad image - a clean-up too far? - Mista Bumpy - 03-21-2011, 02:05 AM

Forum Jump:


1 Guest(s)