Testing the Waters - Printable Version +- Portrait Pro Forums (https://forum.portraitprofessional.com) +-- Forum: Community (https://forum.portraitprofessional.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Photo critique (https://forum.portraitprofessional.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Thread: Testing the Waters (/showthread.php?tid=3048) |
Testing the Waters - lalareid2202 - 03-06-2012 A Self Port...Critique plz! 1st SOOC [attachment=477] 2nd Edit [attachment=478] RE: Testing the Waters - ctconger@gmail.com - 04-30-2012 You are a very pretty girl. Try a little less skin smoothing. RE: Testing the Waters - david5512 - 06-12-2012 (03-06-2012, 06:20 PM)lalareid2202 Wrote: A Self Port...Critique plz! I agree with the other posting. You need very little work. I'd tone it down since just a slight touch up would be stunning. I've been working with one woman whose face needs a great deal of work and in her case, you have to go heavy. Your bone structure and lack of blemishes is outstanding. RE: Testing the Waters - john garrett - 06-12-2012 (03-06-2012, 06:20 PM)lalareid2202 Wrote: A Self Port...Critique plz!you appear to have mastered it on this one john garrett RE: Testing the Waters - gwlaw99 - 10-11-2012 It looks like you focused a little above her eyes so her eyes are not tack sharp. Her mouth and chin look out of focus. RE: Testing the Waters - PaintedRays - 02-18-2013 I agree with all said earlier. A little texture in the skin is necessary. RE: Testing the Waters - randomAccess - 02-20-2013 Well, late to the party and the OP is no doubt long gone, but: - selfies are hard... I ought to know! Especially focus. Choosing about f/4.0 (for a normal distance, say 6' with about an 85mm lens for this shot) and letting the camera face-priority auto-focus in liveview (nikon terms) will give better results. Here, only one eye is in focus - both should be. The rest of the face / image is an artistic choice depending on usage. - the lighting appears to largely on-camera (notice the centred catchlight in the eyes). Get it off-camera for depth! Which can be done at home without umbrellas by bouncing off the ceiling and using a 4x6 white card on the flash for fill (or ambient for fill, or a large white card propped-up near the subject for fill). Give or take. The subject (the OP) is pretty, one could do butterfly lighting easily, or maybe broad lighting too. - the image is under-exposed about one stop. The Red channel never gets past about 220, and it should be 236-241 in the highlights (forehead over eye, and right cheek). - the crop is really, really tight, making the head look quite large. Unless there is some reason to crop this way, I think pulling back and including more hair and neck would help. - head /eye angle is good for a 2/3 view. Shoulder angle is good - neckline is likely too deep, but with this crop and the light intensity dropoff, no problem. Teeth are good. Expression is pretty good considering it is a self-portrait. I think the background colour works with the subject, but would prefer a more-neutral colour, or an opposing colour (blue / green tone) - too-heavy retouch. even magazine covers leave more texture... as others have noted. I find the default PP settings too aggressive. |